This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Corticosteroids are the first-line immunosuppressants in the management of juvenile myasthenia gravis despite their adverse effects. The place of new immunosuppressive therapies is not clearly defined by the last international consensus held in March 2019 due to the lack of clinical trials. The aim of this study is to describe the use of rituximab and its efficacy and safety in 8 main pediatric centers of the French neuromuscular reference network to propose a new place in the therapeutic strategy of juvenile myasthenia gravis.
Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter study from January 1, 2009, to April 30, 2020, including a large cohort of children with myasthenia gravis in 8 main French pediatric reference centers of the FILNEMUS network. The type of myasthenia, different lines of immunosuppressive treatment, and clinical course of the patients were collected. To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab, we studied the clinical course of patients on immunosuppressive therapy. Outcome was defined as the clinical and therapeutic status of patients at the last visit: stable without immunosuppressants, stable with immunosuppressants, or unstable.
Results We included 74 patients: 18 children with ocular form and 56 children with generalized form. Of the 37 patients who required immunosuppressive therapy, 27 were treated with rituximab. Patients treated with rituximab had a better outcome than patients treated with conventional immunosuppressants (p = 0.006). The use of rituximab as a first-line immunosuppressant showed a better efficacy with a discontinuation of immunosuppressants in 75% of patients (vs 25%, p = 0.04) and results in cortisone sparing (42% vs 92%, p = 0.03) compared with rituximab treatment as a second- or third-line immunosuppression. Rituximab was well tolerated; no adverse effect was observed.
Discussion The use of rituximab has increased in France over the last 10 years as a first-line immunosuppressant. This study suggests good tolerability and efficacy of rituximab in juvenile myasthenia gravis. Early use appears to improve outcomes and facilitate cortisone sparing in antibody-positive generalized juvenile myasthenia.
Classification of Evidence This study provides Class III evidence that for children with MG, rituximab is effective and well tolerated.
Glossary
- AChR-ab=
- nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antibodies;
- ChE-I=
- cholinesterase inhibitor;
- CMS=
- congenital myasthenic syndrome;
- ICU=
- intensive care unit;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- IVIG=
- IV immunoglobulin;
- MG=
- myasthenia gravis;
- MuSK-ab=
- muscle-specific kinase antibodies;
- PLEX=
- plasma exchange
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received October 10, 2021.
- Accepted in final form February 10, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
