Misfolded α-Synuclein Assessment in the Skin and CSF by RT-QuIC in Isolated REM Sleep Behavior Disorder
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a976/5a976cd90e54b911da12508529bd7bfd846d68b4" alt="Loading Loading"
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assay detects misfolded α-synuclein (AS) in the skin and CSF of patients with the synucleinopathies Parkinson disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (IRBD) constitutes the prodromal stage of these synucleinopathies. We aimed to compare the ability of RT-QuIC to identify AS in the skin and CSF of patients with IRBD.
Methods This was a cross-sectional study where consecutive patients with polysomnographic-confirmed IRBD and age-matched controls without RBD underwent skin biopsy and lumbar puncture the same day. Three-millimeter skin punch biopsies were obtained bilaterally in the cervical region from dorsal C7 and C8 dermatomes and in distal legs. RT-QuIC assessed AS in these 6 skin sites and the CSF.
Results We recruited 91 patients with IRBD and 41 controls. In the skin, sensitivity to detect AS was 76.9% (95% CI 66.9–85.1), specificity 97.6% (95% CI 87.1–99.9) positive predictive value 98.6% (95% CI 91.0–99.8), negative predictive value 65.6% (95% CI 56.6–73.6), and accuracy 83.3% (95% CI 75.9–89.3). In the CSF, the sensitivity was 75.0% (95% CI 64.6–83.6), the specificity was 97.5% (95% CI 86.8–99.9), the positive predictive value was 98.5% (95% CI 90.5–99.8), the negative predictive value was 63.9% (95% CI 55.2–71.9), and the accuracy was 82.0% (95% CI 74.3–88.3). Results in the skin and CSF samples showed 99.2% agreement. Compared with negative patients, RT-QuIC AS-positive patients had a higher likelihood ratio of prodromal Parkinson disease (p < 0.001) and showed more frequently hyposmia (p < 0.001), dopamine transporter imaging single-photon emission CT deficit (p = 0.002), and orthostatic hypotension (p = 0.014). No severe or moderate adverse effects were reported. There was no difference between the percentage of participants reporting mild adverse events secondary to skin biopsy or lumbar puncture (9.1% vs 17.2%; p = 0.053). One hundred and ten (83%) and 104 (80%) participants, respectively, stated they would accept to undergo skin biopsy and lumbar puncture again for research purposes.
Discussion Our study in IRBD shows that (1) RT-QuIC detects AS in the skin and CSF with similar high sensitivity, specificity, and agreement, (2) AS RT-QuIC positivity is associated with supportive features and biomarkers of synucleinopathy, and (3) skin punch biopsy and lumbar puncture have comparable mild adverse effects, tolerance, and acceptance. RT-QuIC in the skin or CSF might represent a patient selection strategy for future neuroprotective trials targeting AS in IRBD.
Classification of Evidence This study provides Class III evidence that RT-QuIC–detected AS in the skin and CSF distinguishes patients with IRBD from controls.
Glossary
- AS=
- misfolded α-synuclein;
- DAT-SPECT=
- dopamine transporter imaging single-photon emission CT;
- DLB=
- dementia with Lewy bodies;
- HCB=
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona;
- IRBD=
- isolated REM sleep behavior disorder;
- ISNB=
- Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna;
- MCI=
- mild cognitive impairment;
- MDS-UPDRS-III=
- Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale;
- MoCA=
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment;
- MSA=
- multiple system atrophy;
- PBS=
- phosphate-buffered saline;
- PD=
- Parkinson disease;
- RT-QuIC=
- real-time quaking-induced conversion;
- UPSIT-40=
- 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Associate Editor Barbara Jobst, MD, PhD, FAAN.
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received August 25, 2022.
- Accepted in final form January 19, 2023.
- © 2023 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Jessica Ailani and Dr. Ailna Masters-Israilov
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.