Clinical Features and Diagnosis of Intramedullary Spinal Cord Abscess in Adults
A Systematic Review
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Intramedullary spinal cord abscess (ISCA) was described 200 years ago but remains poorly understood and is often mistaken for immune-mediated or neoplastic processes. We present a systematic review of ISCA in adults, describing the clinical presentation, diagnostic features, treatment strategies, and outcomes.
Methods Database searches for intramedullary abscess were performed on April 15, 2019, and repeated on February 9, 2022, using PubMed and EMBASE with 2 unpublished cases also included. Publications were independently reviewed for inclusion by 2 authors followed by adjudication. Data were abstracted using an online form and then analyzed for predictors of disability.
Results A total of 202 cases were included (median age 45 years [interquartile range 31–58]; 70% male). Thirty-one percent of those affected had no identified predisposing condition. The most common symptom was weakness (97%), and the median symptom duration before presentation was 10 days (interquartile range 5–42). An MRI showed restricted diffusion in 100% of 8 cases where performed and enhancement in 99% of 153 cases where performed. The most common organisms were Mycobacterium tuberculosis (29%), Streptococcus sp. (13%), and Staphylococcus sp. (10%). All patients received antimicrobial therapy; surgical drainage was performed in 65%. At follow-up (median 6 months), 12% had died, 69% were ambulatory, and 77% had improved compared with clinical nadir. Of those who underwent operative intervention, surgery within 24 hours of diagnosis was associated with an increased likelihood of being ambulatory at follow-up compared with surgery after 24 hours (odds ratio 4.44; 95% CI 1.26–15.61; p = 0.020).
Discussion ISCA is important to consider in any patient presenting with acute-to-subacute, progressive myelopathy. Immunocompromise and typical signs of infection (e.g., fever) are often absent. Diffusion restriction and gadolinium enhancement on MRI seem to be sensitive. Antimicrobial therapy with surgical drainage is the most common therapeutic approach, but morbidity remains substantial. If performed, urgent surgery may be more beneficial.
Glossary
- DWI=
- diffusion-weighted imaging;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- ISCA=
- intramedullary spinal cord abscess;
- OR=
- odds ratio
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Associate Editor Rebecca Burch, MD.
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received August 5, 2021.
- Accepted in final form April 25, 2023.
- © 2023 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.