This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Female hormone therapy (oral contraception in female patients of reproductive age and menopausal hormone therapy in postmenopausal patients) is not withheld from patients with cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs), although the effects of these drugs on the risk of intracranial hemorrhage are unknown. We investigated the association between female hormone therapy and intracranial hemorrhage in female patients with CCM in 2 large prospective, multicenter, observational cohort studies.
Methods We included consecutive patients with a CCM. We compared the association between use of female hormone therapy and the occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage due to the CCM during up to 5 years of prospective follow-up in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. We performed an additional systematic review through Ovid MEDLINE and Embase from inception to November 2, 2021, to identify comparative studies and assess their intracranial hemorrhage incidence rate ratio according to female hormone therapy use.
Results Of 722 female patients, aged 10 years or older at time of CCM diagnosis, 137 used female hormone therapy at any point during follow-up. Female hormone therapy use (adjusted for age, mode of presentation, and CCM location) was associated with an increased risk of subsequent intracranial hemorrhage (46/137 [33.6%] vs 91/585 [15.6%] and adjusted hazard ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.09–2.24; p = 0.015). Use of oral contraceptives in female patients aged 10–44 years adjusted for the same factors was associated with a higher risk of subsequent intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted hazard ratio 2.00, 95% CI 1.26–3.17; p = 0.003). Our systematic literature search showed no studies reporting on the effect of female hormone therapy on the risk of intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up.
Discussion Female hormone therapy use is associated with a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage from CCMs. These findings raise questions about the safety of female hormone therapy in clinical practice in patients with CCM. Further studies evaluating clinical factors raising risk of thrombosis may be useful to determine which patients may be most susceptible to intracranial hemorrhage.
Classification of Evidence This study provides Class III evidence that female hormone therapy use is associated with a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with CCM.
Glossary
- CCM=
- cerebral cavernous malformation;
- IQR=
- interquartile range
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Editor-in-Chief José Merino, MD, MPhil, FAAN.
Editorial, page 744
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received May 21, 2022.
- Accepted in final form December 20, 2022.
- © 2023 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
