% 0期刊文章% Yogendrakumar, Vignan % Churilov,列昂尼德•米切尔%,彼得·J % Kleinig, Timothy J % Yassi, Nawaf % Thijs,文森特%吴,泰迪%沙,沾光%贝利,彼得%杜威,海伦M %崔,菲利普MC %马英九,爱丽丝%韦杰,Tissa % Garcia-Esperon,卡洛斯%云,杰弗里·钱德拉%,Ronil v % Cordato,丹尼斯·约翰·%燕DMedSc伯纳德%沙玛,选手Gagan %德斯蒙德,帕特里夏·M %帕森斯,马克·W %唐南杰弗里·艾伦·戴维斯%,斯蒂芬·坎贝尔M %,替替普酶和阿替普酶在串联损害性脑卒中患者中的安全性和有效性:TNK extension - ia试验的事后分析0000000000207138% J神半岛投注体育官网经学%P 10.1212/WNL。背景与目的:替替普酶在串联病变性脑卒中患者中的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。我们对串联病变患者的替替普酶和阿替普酶进行了比较分析。方法:我们首先使用来自EXTEND-IA TNK试验的个体患者数据，比较了替替普酶和阿替普酶对串联病变患者的治疗效果。我们用有序logistic和Firth回归模型评估了初次血管造影评估和90天mRS时的颅内再灌注情况。由于在EXTEND-IA TNK试验中接受阿替普酶的患者中，死亡率和症状性颅内出血这两项关键结果很少，我们通过补充试验数据和通过系统综述中确定的研究的荟萃分析获得的发病率估计，对这些结果进行了汇总估计。然后，我们计算了未经调整的风险差异，将接受阿替普酶的患者的汇总估计值与试验中观察到的接受替替普酶的患者的发病率进行比较。结果:在EXTEND-IA TNK试验中，483例患者中有71例(15%)具有串联病变。在双列病变患者中，替替普酶治疗组11/56(20%)与阿替普酶治疗组1/15(7%)患者观察到颅内再灌注(aOR: 2.19;95%置信区间:0.28—-17.29)。 No significant difference in 90-day mRS was observed (adjusted common OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 0.44-5.00). A pooled study-level proportion of alteplase associated mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 0.14 (95% CI: 0.08-0.21) and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.04-0.16), respectively. Compared to a mortality rate of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.03-0.20) and a symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate of 0.07 (95% CI: 0.02-0.17) in tenecteplase treated patients, no significant difference was observed.Conclusions: Functional outcomes, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not significantly differ between tenecteplase and alteplase treated tandem lesion patients.Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that tenecteplase is associated with similar rates of intracranial reperfusion, functional outcome, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage compared with alteplase, in patients with acute stroke due to tandem lesions. However, the confidence intervals do not rule out clinically important differences. %U //www.ebmtp.com/content/neurology/early/2023/03/06/WNL.0000000000207138.full.pdf