IV Thrombolysis Initiated Before Transfer for Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives The role of IV thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with large vessel occlusions (LVOs) administered before transfer from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) is questioned.
Methods We included observational studies of patients with an LVO receiving IVT at a PSC before their endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) transfer compared with those receiving EVT alone. Efficacy outcomes included excellent or good functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores of 0–1 or 0–2, respectively) and reduced disability (mRS shift analysis) at 3 months. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 hours and 3-month all-cause mortality. Associations are reported with crude odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted ORs (aORs).
Results We identified 6 studies, including 1,723 participants (mean age: 71 years, 51% women; 53% treated with IVT at a PSC). The mean onset-to-groin puncture time did not differ between the 2 groups (mean difference: −20 minutes, 95% CI −115.89 to 76.04). Patients receiving IVT before transfer had higher odds of 3-month reduced disability (common OR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.17–3.35), excellent (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.28–2.26), and good (OR = 1.62.95% CI 1.15–2.29) functional outcomes, with no increased sICH (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.54–1.39) or mortality (OR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.37–0.83) risks. In the adjusted analyses, patients receiving IVT at a PSC had higher odds of excellent functional outcome (aOR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.00–1.74) and a lower probability for mortality (aOR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.27–0.93).
Discussion Patients with LVO receiving IVT at a PSC before an EVT transfer have a higher likelihood of excellent functional recovery and lower odds of mortality, with no increase in sICH and onset-to-groin puncture times, compared with those transferred for EVT without previously receiving IVT.
Glossary
- aOR=
- adjusted OR;
- CSC=
- comprehensive stroke center;
- EVT=
- endovascular thrombectomy;
- LVO=
- large vessel occlusion;
- mRS=
- modified Rankin Scale;
- NIHSS=
- NIH Stroke Scale;
- OR=
- odds ratio;
- PSC=
- primary stroke center;
- RCT=
- randomized controlled clinical trial;
- ROBINS-I=
- Risk of Bias in nonrandomized Studies;
- sICH=
- symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Editor-in-Chief José Merino, MD, MPhil, FAAN.
Editorial, page 643
- Received September 24, 2022.
- Accepted in final form November 21, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Costs and Utilization of New-to-Market Neurologic Medications
Dr. Robert J. Fox and Dr. Mandy Leonard